Last modified: 2018-06-12
Abstract
Abstract Muovendo dall’interesse per il rapporto tra stato lavorativo e benessere soggettivo, questo studio si concentra sul modulo ad-hoc sul benessere soggettivo dell’Indagine europea sul reddito e sulle condizioni di vita (Eu-SILC) 2013. In accordo con le Linee guida OCSE sulla misurazione del benessere soggettivo (2013), assumiamo in premessa la multidimensionalità del benessere soggettivo. Per preservare tale multidimensionalità , è stato adottato un metodo di aggregazione delle dimensioni del benessere basato sull'ordinamento parziale. Questo contributo confronta i risultati della metodologia di Ordinamento Parziale con i risultati di altri metodi di aggregazione.
Â
Key words: Subjective Well-being indicators, Decent work, Partial Ordering Methodology.
References
-
Arcagni, A., and Fattore, M.: PARSEC: An R package for poset-based evaluation of multidimensional poverty. In: R. Bruggemann, L. Carlsen, & J. Wittmann (Eds.), MultiIndicator systems and modelling in partial order. Berlin: Springer (2014)
-
Conigliaro, P.: Labour Status and Subjective Well-being. A Micro-level Analysis and a Multidimensional Approach to Well-being. Working Papers Series of PhD Course in Applied Social Sciences (2018)
-
Conigliaro, P., and L. Alaimo: Labour Status and Subjective Well-being A Micro-level Analysis and a Multidimensional Approach to Well-being (step II applying a Partial ordering methodology). Firenze. Contribute to the AIQUAV Conference (2017)
-
Diener, Ed, and Robert A. Emmons: “The Independence of Positive and Negative Affects.†In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(5): 1105-1117 (1984)
-
Diener, Ed, D. Wirtz, R. Biswas-Diener, W. Tov, C. Kim-Prieto, D. Choi, and S. Oishi “New: Measures of Well-being.†In: Assessing Well-Being - The Collected Works of Ed Diener, pp.247-266. Springer International Publishing Agency (2009)
-
Eurostat: Eu-Silc Module on Wellbeing - Assessment of the Implementation. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1012329/1012401/2013+Module+assessment.pdf (2013)
-
Eurostat: Quality of life, Fact and Views. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (2015)
-
Eurostat: Analytical Report on Subjective Well-being. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (2016)
-
Fattore, M., F. Maggino, and A. Arcagni: “Exploiting Ordinal Data for Subjective Well-being Evaluation.†In: Statistic in Transition. The measurement of Subjective Well-being in Survey Research. 16(3): 400-428 (2015)
-
Huppert, F. A., and T.T.C. So: “Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-beingâ€. Social Indicator Research 110(3): 837-861 (2013)
-
ILO: Decent Work and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Geneva: ILO (2017)
-
Maggino, F. “Subjective Wellbeing and Subjective Aspects of Wellbeing: Methodology and Theory.†In: Rivista internazionale di scienze sociali 128(1): 89-121 (2015)
-
Michalos, A. C: “Multiple Discrepancy Theory.†In: Social Indicator Research 16(4):347-413 (1985)
-
OECD: Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing (2013)
-
Ware, J. E., K. K. Snow, M. Kosinski, and B. Gandek: SF-36 Health Survey – Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: Nimrod Press (1993)
Â