Open Conference Systems, 50th Scientific meeting of the Italian Statistical Society

Font Size: 
The climate funds for energy sustainability: a counterfactual analysis
Giuseppe Scandurra, Alfonso Carfora, Monica Ronghi

Last modified: 2018-05-31


In this paper we analyze the effectiveness of climate funds to combat climate change and promote mitigation and adaptation policies. We analyse the funds received by the recipient through a counterfactual analysis. The results show that the policy contributed to the decreasing of greenhouse gas emissions and promoted the change in generation energy systems supporting the replacement of fossil sources with renewable sources.


ROSENBAUM, P. R., RUBIN D. B.: The Central Role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika \textbf{70}, 41-–55 (1983).
MARQUES, A.C., FUINHAS, J.A., PIRES MANSO, J. R.:  A quantile approach to identify factors promoting renewable energy in European Countries. Environmental and Resources Economics  \textbf{49},  351--366 (2011).

AUSTIN, P.C.: An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies, Multivariate Behavioral Research, \textbf{46}, 399-–424 (2011).

JAKOB, M., STECKEL, J.C., FLACHSLAND C., BAUMSTARK, L.: Climate Finance for Developing Country Mitigation: Blessing or Curse?, Climate and Development, \textbf{7}, 1--15 (2015) .

SAIDI, K., BEN MBAREK, M.: Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO2 emissions and economic growth for nine developed countries: Evidence from panel Granger causality tests, Progress in Nuclear Energy \textbf{88}, 364–374 (2016).

Full Text: PDF